POPA Recon@Ravencoin's asset transfer qty overflow bug is worth spelling out because the overflow did NOT create an infinite RVN mint, nor a clean…
@Ravencoin's asset transfer qty overflow bug is worth spelling out because the overflow did NOT create an infinite RVN mint, nor a clean “mint arbitrary assets forever” primitive. What it did was subtler: it allowed an invalid asset transfer to pass the asset conservation check on vulnerable nodes, so a bad block could be accepted by one side of the network and rejected by nodes following the fixed rules. The first known invalid block was 4,487,776 at 2026-08-07 15:44:01 UTC, meaning everything after 4,487,775 should be treated as reorg-risk until the network converges. @EthSecurity1
The excerpt is quoted from a public Telegram channel, which owns its text.