Selig’s message is that the CFTC intends to keep working on crypto market rules under its existing statutory authority despite Congress failing to pass the CLARITY Act; he said the SEC is proceeding similarly. The posts present this as regulators moving ahead without waiting for legislation (CoinMarketCap, cryptorover, Bitcoin Magazine).

CLARITY ActCFTCOct 6, 2026, 17:51 UTC

The concrete CFTC step is an advance notice seeking public comment on a proposed framework for retail crypto transactions involving leverage, margin, or financing, and on a purpose-built “crypto asset market” registration category. The Commission says comments will inform possible future action, such as rulemaking (CFTC release 9307-26). So “CLARITY is coming” is the posters’ upbeat interpretation: the CFTC has started a rulemaking process, but the notice itself is not a final rule or a substitute for legislation.

Ask your own

Case file

CLARITY Act

CFTC

Answered Oct 6, 2026, 17:51 UTC

Sources 4

Research trace 26

The supplied posts report Selig’s remarks but do not establish the CFTC’s specific plans or the context of the proposed rules. First, check the linked posts and recent CFTC statements for the agency’s stated actions after the CLARITY Act stalled.
The prior search names two CFTC frameworks—Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions (CTX) and Regulation Crypto Asset Markets (CAM)—but does not establish their proposed scope or procedural status. Search for Selig’s fuller explanation and recent official CFTC statements about those proposals.
The search surfaced an official CFTC notice and a 60-day comment period, but social summaries differ on the proposal’s scope. I’ll check the agency’s announcement and Selig’s full post to distinguish the proposal’s stated terms from commentary.
The CFTC’s release confirms it has opened an advance notice process and may use the responses to inform later action. Next, find Selig’s fuller remarks on the stalled CLARITY Act and what authority he says the agency will use.
The CFTC’s October 5 notice describes an advance consultation, with comments due within 60 days of Federal Register publication, and says responses may inform future action. I’ll look for Selig’s fuller explanation of how he expects the agency to proceed under its current authority after the CLARITY Act stalled.
The CFTC’s notice establishes a consultation on retail crypto transactions involving leverage, margin, or financing, but it does not itself adopt rules. I’ll check the full Selig remarks and contemporaneous reporting to clarify what he says the agency plans next and separate that from commentators’ interpretations.
The results show the CFTC has begun a consultation and Selig says it will use existing authority, but they do not establish the full content of the CFTC chair’s proposed approach or how the posts frame its limits. Check Selig’s linked article and the Commission’s formal notice for those specifics.
The prior results establish what the CFTC is formally considering and that the CLARITY Act has not advanced. To answer what the posts are saying, check current reactions and reporting for how they characterize the agency’s plans and the limits of rulemaking without Congress.
The CFTC’s notice confirms it has opened an advance consultation, not adopted final rules. I’m checking whether Selig’s full CNBC remarks add specifics to the posts’ claim that the agency will move ahead without the CLARITY Act.
The previous results establish that the CFTC opened an advance notice process, but not the full CNBC interview context behind the posts. I’ll look for published coverage or a transcript of Selig’s remarks to clarify what he says the agency intends to do under existing authority.
The supplied posts and prior results already establish Selig’s remarks and the CFTC’s October 5 consultation. Check whether the SEC’s actions and the latest public reactions add context to what people mean when they say the agencies will proceed without the CLARITY Act.
The earlier steps establish that the CFTC has begun a consultation and Selig says the agency will use its existing authority. Since the posts refer to the SEC “doing the same,” check recent SEC statements and the source of the posts’ framing for what parallel action they mean.
The earlier findings establish the CFTC’s October 5 consultation and its proposed focus. I’ll check for any post-announcement update on the consultation’s status or deadline, since that could clarify what the agency is doing now after the CLARITY Act stalled.
The official notice confirms an active consultation, while the supplied posts quote Selig’s resolve to use existing authority. I’m checking the full CNBC segment and CFTC material for the specific rulemaking path behind those remarks.
The prior results already identify the CFTC’s advance notice and Selig’s stated intent to use existing authority. Check the full post underlying his October 5 announcement for what he says Congress’s failure means, the proposed rules’ scope, and their limits.
The CFTC’s official notice and Selig’s earlier remarks establish the proposal’s scope and process. Check the original CNBC clip or transcript, if available, to verify the latest quotes and what Selig specifically says the agency plans after Congress failed to pass the CLARITY Act.
The previous results establish the CFTC’s planned consultation and Selig’s “statutory authority” remarks, but the latest posts are short summaries. Check current reactions to see whether they are describing concrete rulemaking details or interpreting the announcement more broadly.
Earlier results already show the CFTC’s October 5 consultation and Selig’s statement that the agency will use existing authority. The latest posts summarize that position; check for any newer official action or a published CNBC segment that clarifies what the agency intends to do next.
The earlier findings identify the CFTC’s October 5 consultation and the posts’ claims. Check the latest post and its quotes for reactions that clarify what people mean by saying the CFTC will proceed with market-structure rules without the CLARITY Act.
The prior results establish what Selig said and what the CFTC is considering. The original question asks what the posts are saying, so I’ll check the linked post’s full text and the CFTC’s latest official explanation to clarify the proposal’s current status and scope.
The supplied posts and earlier findings establish that Selig says the CFTC will use its existing authority and that an advance notice is underway. Check whether the formal notice has since been published in the Federal Register, which determines when its 60-day comment window runs.
The CFTC’s October 5 notice says comments are due within 60 days after Federal Register publication, so the precise deadline depends on that publication date. Check whether it has been published and whether Selig’s CNBC remarks have fuller coverage clarifying what he intends to do.
The posts state that Selig will use the CFTC’s existing authority, and the earlier results identify an October 5 advance notice seeking comments on crypto retail transactions and crypto asset market registration. Check the latest public discussion for what people infer from that announcement, while keeping the proposal’s actual status distinct from the posts’ broader claim that “CLARITY is coming.”
The prior results show the CFTC has opened an advance notice process, but the posts’ phrase “CLARITY is coming” could imply more than that process establishes. Check for the original CNBC coverage or a fresh CFTC update to see whether Selig described any concrete next step beyond using existing authority.
The CFTC’s October 5 notice and Selig’s remarks already establish the plan: seek comment on a framework for certain leveraged, margined, or financed retail crypto transactions and a purpose-built crypto-market registration category. Check the latest CFTC post to confirm how the agency itself characterizes this stage and its scope.
The supplied posts capture Selig’s broad commitment, while earlier findings establish the CFTC’s consultation. I’m checking for additional details on what the proposed frameworks would do and whether the posts overstate their current status.